Skip to main content

Cross v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

U.S. Supreme CourtMarch 22, 2004No. No. 03-737
Defendant WinFederal Government
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
Circuit
5th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Supreme Court denied certiorari in a federal-employee labor relations case, allowing the Fifth Circuit's decision to stand. This constitutes a loss for the petitioner (Cross) challenging a Federal Labor Relations Authority decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Cross v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (2004)** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Cross and the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), the agency that oversees labor relations for federal government workers. While the specific details of Cross's complaint aren't provided in the available information, it was an employment-related dispute that made its way through the federal court system. The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, but the Court chose not to hear it by denying what's called "certiorari" - essentially declining to review the case. This meant that a lower court's decision from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals remained in effect. That earlier court had ruled against Cross, and the Supreme Court's refusal to intervene meant Cross lost the case entirely. **What this means for workers:** When the Supreme Court declines to hear a case, it doesn't create new legal precedent, but it does leave existing lower court decisions in place. For federal employees specifically, this case suggests that certain types of disputes with the FLRA may be difficult to win, though without knowing the specific legal issues involved, workers should consult with employment attorneys about their particular situations involving federal labor relations matters.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Cross from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.