Skip to main content

Hunter v. Cole Tool & Die Co.

Ohio Ct. App.June 27, 2023No. 2022 CA 0059Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
King
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the employer, Cole Tool & Die Company, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish the required deliberate intent to injure under Ohio's intentional tort statute.

Excerpt

Summary judgment on employer intentional tort press crushed hand

What This Ruling Means

# Hunter v. Cole Tool & Die Co. ## What Happened A worker at Cole Tool & Die Company suffered a serious hand injury when a press crushed their hand. The worker filed a lawsuit claiming the employer intentionally caused this injury. ## What the Court Decided The Ohio appellate court ruled in favor of the employer. The court found that the worker did not provide enough evidence to prove the employer deliberately intended to cause the injury. Because intentional harm requires proof that someone acted on purpose to hurt someone else—not just that an accident happened—the court dismissed the case. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling shows that workers injured by equipment at work face a high legal hurdle if they try to sue for intentional harm. Employers are generally protected unless they can be proven to have deliberately caused an injury on purpose. Workers who suffer job-related injuries typically pursue claims through workers' compensation insurance instead, which doesn't require proving the employer intended harm but also limits damages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.