Skip to main content

Hurston v. Grand Trunk W. RR. Co.

Ohio Ct. App.April 26, 2024No. L-23-1059
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Duhart
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment for the railroad employer, finding that the plaintiff's FELA negligence claim was barred by the three-year statute of limitations because the plaintiff knew or should have known of the causal connection between his cancer and workplace toxic exposures at the time of diagnosis in December 2016.

Excerpt

Judge Duhart, Federal Employers' Liability Act ("FELA") statute of limitations, application of discovery rule

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.