Skip to main content

Hayden v. Adams

Ill. App. Ct.April 16, 2020No. 1-19-1411
Plaintiff WinWilliam Adams d/b/a Adams Remodeling
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Hayden, finding that defendant Adams' mechanics lien was invalid and forfeited because Adams failed to comply with section 34 of the Mechanics Lien Act by not responding to the demand notice within 30 days.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.