Skip to main content

Daniel v. ABM Industries Incorporated

E.D. Ark.March 31, 2022No. 4:21-cv-00269
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

Court granted defendant ABM's motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff's Title VII gender discrimination and retaliation claims, finding a valid and enforceable mutual arbitration agreement was signed by the employee on April 2, 2019.

What This Ruling Means

**Daniel v. ABM Industries: Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved an employment discrimination claim filed by Daniel against ABM Industries Incorporated, a facilities services company. Daniel alleged that the company discriminated against him in violation of federal employment laws. The case was heard in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in March 2022. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning are not available from the provided information. The case record shows no damages were reported, but the ultimate outcome - whether Daniel won or lost his discrimination claim - cannot be determined from the available details. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case highlights important rights that workers have. Employees who believe they've faced workplace discrimination based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, religion, or disability can file legal claims against their employers. Federal laws protect workers from discrimination and retaliation. If you experience discrimination at work, you have the right to file complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and potentially pursue legal action. Workers should document incidents and know that legal protections exist, even against large corporations like ABM Industries.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.