Skip to main content

Ferrell v. Buckingham Property Management

E.D. Cal.January 25, 2022No. 1:19-cv-00332
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Partial summary judgment granted; damages calculation and remaining wage claims remanded for further proceedings

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage and Hour

Outcome

Court found wage and hour violations but determined damages calculation required further proceedings; case partially decided on merits with remaining issues remanded.

What This Ruling Means

**Ferrell v. Buckingham Property Management: Mixed Victory in Wage Case** This case involved a worker who sued Buckingham Property Management for wage and hour violations. The employee claimed the company failed to pay proper minimum wages and overtime compensation that was legally required. The court reached a mixed decision. Judges found that Buckingham Property Management did indeed violate wage and hour laws by not paying the worker correctly. However, the court could not immediately determine how much money the worker was owed in damages. Instead of calculating the exact amount, the court sent the case back to lower proceedings to figure out the specific dollar amount the company must pay. This ruling matters for workers because it shows courts will hold employers accountable for wage violations, even when the damage calculation is complex. While the employee didn't receive immediate monetary compensation, the court's finding that violations occurred establishes important legal precedent. Workers facing similar situations can take encouragement that courts recognize wage theft as a serious issue. However, the case also demonstrates that winning on the legal merits doesn't always mean quick financial relief, as calculating proper damages can require additional court proceedings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.