Teague v. Quad Cities Retail
C.D. Ill.July 10, 2023No. 4:21-cv-04097
Defendant WinQuad Cities Retail
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- State
- Illinois
- Circuit
- Seventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Discrimination
What This Ruling Means
I don't have enough information about the Teague v. Quad Cities Retail case to provide an accurate summary. The details you've provided only include basic case information (court, filing date, and that it involved discrimination claims), but the excerpt section that would contain the actual court ruling details is empty.
To write a helpful summary for workers, I would need:
- The specific facts of what happened between the employee and employer
- What type of discrimination was alleged
- The court's actual decision and reasoning
- Any important legal principles the court applied
Without these key details, I cannot accurately explain what the dispute was about, how the court ruled, or what it means for other workers. If you can provide the court's actual ruling or decision text, I'd be happy to summarize it in plain English for a non-lawyer audience.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Browse more:Discrimination cases
Similar Rulings
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Coleman
7th CircuitJun 2017
Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLC
2nd CircuitDec 2013
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.