Skip to main content

Sandin v. USD 500 Kansas City, Kansas

D. Kan.February 8, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02616
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Kansas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court granted the defendant school district's partial motion to dismiss the plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim (Count II) because compensatory and punitive damages are not available for ADA retaliation claims under applicable law, though the plaintiff was given leave to amend her complaint to assert equitable relief such as reinstatement and back pay.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Injured at Workplace, But Landlord Not Responsible** This case involved a worker who was injured in a slip-and-fall accident at New Boulevard Baking Co. The accident happened because of a leaky roof that made the floor slippery and dangerous. Instead of suing only their employer, the injured worker also sued Hill Creek Farms, Inc., the company that owned the building where they worked. The court ruled in favor of the building owner, finding they were not responsible for the worker's injuries. The judge determined that the lease agreement between the building owner and New Boulevard Baking Co. clearly stated that the tenant (the baking company) was responsible for all building repairs and maintenance. Since the landlord had given up control of the property to the tenant, they couldn't be held liable for the dangerous conditions. **What this means for workers:** If you're injured at work due to unsafe building conditions, you may only be able to seek compensation from your employer, not the building owner. Property owners who lease buildings to employers can often avoid liability if their lease agreements place repair responsibilities on the tenant. This highlights the importance of workplace safety enforcement by employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.