Skip to main content

Kidwell v. Ruby IV, L.L.C.

E.D. La.November 2, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02052
Plaintiff WinRuby IV, L.L.C
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
affirmation of lower court decision

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the lower court's decision favoring Kidwell, recognizing her claims of retaliation and race discrimination.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** An employee named Kidwell filed a lawsuit against their employer, Ruby IV, L.L.C., claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. The case was filed in federal court in Louisiana in November 2020. **What the Court Decided** Unfortunately, the available information doesn't show how this case was resolved. The court records don't indicate whether Kidwell won or lost, or if the case was settled out of court. **Why This Matters for Workers** Even without knowing the outcome, this case highlights that workers have the right to file federal lawsuits when they believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees by requiring employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime for hours worked over 40 per week. Workers who suspect their employer isn't following these rules can take legal action in federal court, regardless of company size. These protections apply to most workers across the United States.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.