Teresa Tolliver v. Eleven Slade Apartment Corporation
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Civil Rights: Jobs
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Employer prevailed on summary judgment. Plaintiff's ADA disability discrimination claim was time-barred because the EEOC charge was filed more than 300 days after the alleged discrimination, and her intentional infliction of emotional distress claim failed as a matter of law under Maryland law.
What This Ruling Means
Teresa Tolliver v. Eleven Slade Apartment Corporation
What Happened
Teresa Tolliver filed a lawsuit against her employer, Eleven Slade Apartment Corporation, claiming she faced discrimination based on a disability and that the company failed to make reasonable accommodations for her condition. She also claimed the company intentionally caused her emotional distress.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the employer. The judge dismissed the case before trial, ruling that Tolliver waited too long to file her complaint with the government agency that handles discrimination cases. She filed her complaint more than 300 days after the alleged discrimination occurred, violating the legal time limit. Additionally, her emotional distress claim failed because Maryland law does not support this type of case under these circumstances.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling emphasizes an important deadline: workers who believe they've experienced discrimination must file complaints promptly—typically within 300 days. Delays in reporting can result in losing your case entirely, regardless of whether the discrimination actually happened. If you experience workplace discrimination, document it and contact the appropriate government agency as soon as possible.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.