Su v. Spearman, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted the Secretary of Labor's partial summary judgment motion on FLSA violations. The court found the defendants liable for recordkeeping violations and minimum wage violations affecting 181 employees, with calculated back wages of $234,069.74, but denied certain other aspects of the Secretary's claims pending further proceedings.
What This Ruling Means
Su v. Spearman, Inc. – What Workers Need to Know
What Happened
The Secretary of Labor brought a case against Spearman, Inc. and related companies, claiming they violated federal wage laws. The allegations included wage theft and failing to properly accommodate employees. The case involved 181 workers who were allegedly affected by these violations.
What the Court Decided
The court agreed with the government on some claims but not others. The judge found the companies guilty of breaking federal record-keeping rules and paying workers below the required minimum wage. As a result, the companies must pay $234,069.74 in back wages to affected employees. However, the court said some of the government's other claims needed more examination before a final decision could be made.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that employers must maintain accurate pay records and meet minimum wage requirements. The decision shows courts will hold companies accountable when they fail to do so. If you believe your employer hasn't paid you properly or kept accurate records, this case demonstrates that workers have legal protections and can seek back pay owed to them.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.