Skip to main content

Ruede v. CertainTeed Corporation d/b/a CertainTeed Saint-Gobain

E.D. Mich.September 10, 2021No. 2:19-cv-12943
Defendant WinWestinghouse Broadcasting Company, Inc.$434,026.6 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

Defendants prevailed on discrimination claims against two of three plaintiffs; the third plaintiff (Cochrane) won against one individual defendant but lost against the corporate defendant. Santantonio lost entirely and was assessed $96,883.12 in costs after rejecting a $100,000 settlement offer.

What This Ruling Means

**CertainTeed Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved three employees who sued CertainTeed Corporation (a building materials company) claiming they faced workplace discrimination and were wrongfully terminated from their jobs. The workers alleged their employer treated them unfairly based on protected characteristics and fired them illegally. The court ruled mostly in favor of the company. Two of the three employees lost their discrimination claims entirely. The third employee, Cochrane, had mixed results - winning against one individual supervisor but losing against the company itself. One employee, Santantonio, not only lost the case but was ordered to pay the company $96,883 in legal costs. This happened because Santantonio had rejected a $100,000 settlement offer before trial, and the final result was worse than what the company had offered. This case shows workers several important lessons: discrimination claims can be difficult to prove in court, and employers often have strong legal defenses. Workers should carefully consider settlement offers, as rejecting them can lead to paying the employer's legal costs if they lose at trial. Having strong evidence and legal representation is crucial when pursuing workplace discrimination cases, as the financial risks can be significant.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.