Skip to main content

DEJESUS v. KIDS ACADEMY, INC.

D.N.J.August 31, 2021No. 1:18-cv-13822
Plaintiff WinKids Academy, Inc.$177,452.8 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationWrongful TerminationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

Plaintiff obtained default judgment against defendant employer for violations of the ADA, ADEA, FMLA, and NJLAD. Although defendants later moved to vacate the default judgment, the court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment on all claims, finding plaintiff entitled to back pay, front pay, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

DeJesus v. Kids Academy, Inc. — Plain English Summary

What Happened

An employee sued Kids Academy, Inc., claiming the company discriminated against them based on age or disability, refused to accommodate a medical condition under the Family and Medical Leave Act, retaliated against them for asserting legal rights, and wrongfully terminated their employment.

What the Court Decided

The court ruled in the employee's favor on all claims. Because the company failed to respond adequately to the lawsuit, the judge entered a default judgment—meaning the company lost by default. The employee won $177,452.80 in damages, including back pay (wages owed), front pay (future lost earnings), additional compensation for harm suffered, and attorney's fees.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case reinforces that employers must follow federal and state laws protecting workers from age and disability discrimination, provide medical leave when required, and cannot punish employees for using their legal rights. The significant damages award shows courts take these violations seriously and will compensate workers substantially when employers fail to defend themselves properly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in DEJESUS from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.