No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is entitled to FMLA protection for the period before his mother's death (June 8, 2019), but not for subsequent care of his grandmother. The case proceeds to trial on the interference and retaliation claims for the pre-death leave period.
Blake v. Alstom Transportation Inc.
What Happened
Blake took time off work under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to care for his mother before her death in June 2019. After his mother passed away, he continued taking leave to care for his grandmother. Alstom Transportation claimed Blake was not entitled to this additional leave and accused him of interfering with his job. Blake argued the company retaliated against him for taking protected time off.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled that Blake had FMLA protection only for the period before his mother died on June 8, 2019. The leave to care for his grandmother afterward was not covered. However, the court allowed Blake's interference and retaliation claims to move forward to trial, meaning the full case will still be heard. No money damages were awarded at this stage.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that FMLA protection applies to caring for specific family members during their lifetimes. Workers should understand exactly who qualifies under FMLA and document their reasons for leave carefully.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.