Skip to main content

BLAKE v. ALSTOM TRANSPORTATION INC.

D.N.J.November 28, 2022No. 1:20-cv-13603
Mixed ResultAlstom Transportation Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is entitled to FMLA protection for the period before his mother's death (June 8, 2019), but not for subsequent care of his grandmother. The case proceeds to trial on the interference and retaliation claims for the pre-death leave period.

What This Ruling Means

Blake v. Alstom Transportation Inc.

What Happened

Blake took time off work under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to care for his mother before her death in June 2019. After his mother passed away, he continued taking leave to care for his grandmother. Alstom Transportation claimed Blake was not entitled to this additional leave and accused him of interfering with his job. Blake argued the company retaliated against him for taking protected time off.

What the Court Decided

The court ruled that Blake had FMLA protection only for the period before his mother died on June 8, 2019. The leave to care for his grandmother afterward was not covered. However, the court allowed Blake's interference and retaliation claims to move forward to trial, meaning the full case will still be heard. No money damages were awarded at this stage.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case shows that FMLA protection applies to caring for specific family members during their lifetimes. Workers should understand exactly who qualifies under FMLA and document their reasons for leave carefully.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.