Skip to main content

Stathatos v. Gottlieb

E.D.N.Y.April 6, 2020No. 1:18-cv-03332
Plaintiff WinGottlieb
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal denied, remanded for further proceedings in the district court.

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of Stathatos, finding evidence of discriminatory practices by the employer.

What This Ruling Means

I don't have enough information from the provided excerpt to write a meaningful summary of Stathatos v. Gottlieb. The details you've shared only tell us this was a discrimination case filed in 2020 in a New York federal court, with Gottlieb as the employer, but there's no information about: - What type of discrimination was alleged - What specific events led to the lawsuit - What the court actually decided - The reasoning behind the decision To provide you with an accurate, helpful summary for workers, I would need the actual court ruling or a more detailed case excerpt that explains: - The facts of the dispute - The legal claims made - The court's analysis and decision - Any important legal principles established If you can provide more details from the court's opinion or ruling, I'd be happy to write a clear, plain-English summary that explains what happened, what the court decided, and why it matters for workers facing similar situations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.