Skip to main content

Hollingsworth v. Theatrical Teamsters Union Local 817 IBT

E.D.N.Y.May 7, 2020No. 2:16-cv-04700
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court dismissed plaintiff's federal discrimination, retaliation, and FMLA claims as time-barred and for failure to state a claim. The court also dismissed plaintiff's state law claims without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

What This Ruling Means

**Hollingsworth v. Theatrical Teamsters Union Local 817 IBT** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Hollingsworth and Theatrical Teamsters Union Local 817, a labor union that represents entertainment industry workers. Hollingsworth filed a lawsuit claiming employment discrimination and civil rights violations against the union. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Eastern District in May 2020. Unfortunately, the available court records do not provide enough detail to determine what specific type of discrimination occurred or what the final outcome of the case was. The case involved claims under employment discrimination and civil rights laws, but the exact nature of the alleged violations and whether Hollingsworth won or lost the case remains unclear from the documentation. **What This Means for Workers:** Even though the outcome is unknown, this case highlights an important principle: workers have the right to file discrimination claims not just against employers, but also against their own unions if they believe they've been treated unfairly. Labor unions have legal obligations to treat all members fairly and without discrimination. Workers who feel their union has discriminated against them based on protected characteristics have legal options to seek justice through the courts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.