Han v. Shang Noodle House, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Defendants granted summary judgment on plaintiff's FLSA wage-and-hour claims because the restaurant failed to meet the $500,000 enterprise threshold required under FLSA, but summary judgment was denied on plaintiff's FLSA retaliation claim, which proceeds to trial.
What This Ruling Means
Han v. Shang Noodle House, Inc.
What Happened
A worker named Han sued Shang Noodle House, a restaurant, claiming the employer failed to pay wages properly and punished him for complaining about pay violations.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the restaurant on the wage theft claim because the business didn't meet the size requirement needed to fall under federal wage laws—it made less than $500,000 in annual revenue. However, the court allowed Han's retaliation claim to move forward to trial. This means a judge or jury will still hear whether the restaurant punished Han for speaking up about wage problems.
Why This Matters
This case shows an important limitation: smaller businesses may not be covered by federal wage protection laws, even if workers believe they were underpaid. However, the retaliation part of Han's case survived, meaning workers can still potentially challenge being fired or mistreated after raising wage concerns. The outcome highlights how business size affects which laws protect workers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Han from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.