Rosales Medina v. Taco Mix LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff prevailed on default judgment for FLSA and NYLL violations. Court awarded $98,603 in damages including unpaid overtime, liquidated damages, spread-of-hours compensation, statutory damages for wage notice/statement violations, attorney's fees, and costs.
What This Ruling Means
Rosales Medina v. Taco Mix LLC
What Happened
An employee named Rosales Medina sued Taco Mix LLC for wage theft and wrongful termination. The company failed to respond to the legal case, resulting in a default judgment against them.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in Rosales Medina's favor, awarding $98,603 in damages. This payment covered unpaid overtime pay, additional compensation for not following proper work-hour practices, penalties for failing to provide required wage statements, and attorney's fees to cover legal costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers must follow federal and New York wage laws. Workers are entitled to overtime pay when they work extra hours, and companies must provide clear wage information. When employers ignore legal requirements—and fail to defend themselves in court—they can face significant financial penalties. This ruling demonstrates that workers have legal protections if they're not properly paid, and employers who violate these laws face real financial consequences.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.