No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff obtained a default judgment against Wally's Deli & Grocery Corp. and its owner for wage and hour violations under the FLSA and New York Labor Law. The court found defendants liable for unpaid overtime, spread-of-hours compensation, liquidated damages, and statutory damages for failure to provide wage statements, with damages to be determined at an inquest.
Rescalvo Vazquez v. Wally's Deli & Grocery Corp.
What Happened
Rescalvo Vazquez sued his employer, Wally's Deli & Grocery Corp., claiming the company failed to pay him overtime wages and wrongfully fired him. He argued the deli violated federal and New York wage laws by not properly compensating him for extra hours worked.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in favor of Vazquez. The judge found the deli and its owner guilty of breaking wage and hour laws. The company must pay Vazquez unpaid overtime, compensation for spread hours (gaps between shifts), and additional penalties for failing to provide proper wage statements. The exact amount of money owed will be determined later in court.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore overtime pay requirements. Even small businesses like delis must follow wage laws. Workers who believe they've been underpaid have legal protections and can take action through courts. The added penalty damages show courts take wage theft seriously and will punish employers beyond just paying back what's owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.