Skip to main content

Tepox Gutierrez v. 300 West 46th St. Corp.

S.D.N.Y.June 8, 2021No. 1:18-cv-04239
Plaintiff Win300 West 46th St. Corp$250,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages for unpaid overtime and meal breaks.

What This Ruling Means

I cannot provide a meaningful summary of this employment law case because there appears to be a significant error in the case information provided. **What happened:** The case is listed as "Tepox Gutierrez v. 300 West 46th St. Corp." and described as a 2021 employment law dispute. However, the actual document excerpt describes a completely different matter - a 1932 Louisiana election law case about primary election procedures and mandamus relief. **What the court decided:** The outcome cannot be determined because the document excerpt doesn't match the case title or description. The provided text discusses historical election law, not workplace issues. **Why this matters for workers:** Without access to the correct case documents, it's impossible to explain what this ruling means for workers' rights or employment protections. This appears to be a data error where the wrong legal document was attached to the case information. To understand how this case might affect workers, you would need access to the actual employment law ruling between Tepox Gutierrez and 300 West 46th St. Corp., not the Louisiana election law document that was provided.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.