No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court approved a settlement agreement under which plaintiff received $6,365.35 in compensation for wage and hour violations under the FLSA and NYLL, as well as pregnancy discrimination claims under NYSHRL and NYCHRL. The settlement represented approximately 49% of plaintiff's estimated range of possible recovery.
Flores v. Dynamic Wireless NYC LLC: Employment Law Case Summary
This case involved a worker named Flores who sued their employer, Dynamic Wireless NYC LLC, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. Flores alleged that Dynamic Wireless failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections.
The Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to pay workers at least the federal minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek. When employers don't follow these rules, workers can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages and other damages.
Unfortunately, the court records available don't show how this case was resolved or what the final outcome was for the worker involved.
What This Means for Workers:
This case highlights that employees have legal rights when it comes to fair pay. If you believe your employer isn't paying you properly for your work hours or overtime, you may have options under federal law. The FLSA protects most workers, and you can file complaints or lawsuits if these wage and hour rules are violated. Keep detailed records of your work hours and pay to protect yourself.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.