Skip to main content

Picorelli v. Watermark Contractors Inc.

S.D.N.Y.July 1, 2022No. 7:21-cv-02433
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Court denied without prejudice the parties' proposed settlement agreement to resolve FLSA and New York wage-and-hour claims. The settlement would have provided $30,000 total ($10,000 to plaintiff, $20,000 for attorney fees), but the court found insufficient information to determine if the settlement was fair and reasonable and required additional documentation.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Dispute Over Wage Laws** This case involved a worker named Picorelli who filed a lawsuit against Watermark Contractors Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. Specifically, Picorelli alleged that Watermark Contractors failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules about minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections for employees. The Fair Labor Standards Act requires most employers to pay workers at least the federal minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked beyond 40 in a week. When employers don't follow these rules, workers can sue to recover unpaid wages and additional penalties. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough information to determine how this case was resolved or what the final outcome was for either party. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights that employees have the right to challenge employers who don't follow federal wage laws. Workers who believe their employer has failed to pay proper wages or overtime can file lawsuits under the Fair Labor Standards Act to seek compensation. Even when case outcomes aren't publicly detailed, these legal protections remain an important tool for ensuring fair pay in the workplace.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.