Garcia v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- settlement
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved settlement agreements between five named plaintiffs and ABM Industry Groups, LLC in a Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour class action. The case was dismissed without prejudice following settlement approval on July 28, 2022.
What This Ruling Means
Garcia v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC — Settlement Approved
What Happened
A group of workers employed by ABM Industry Groups, LLC filed a lawsuit claiming the company violated federal wage laws by not properly paying them for their work. Five employees led this case on behalf of themselves and other workers facing similar problems. The lawsuit was based on the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules for how much employers must pay workers and when.
What the Court Decided
In July 2022, a federal court in New York approved a settlement agreement between the workers and ABM. This means both sides agreed to resolve the dispute without going to trial. The court dismissed the case after confirming the settlement was fair to the employees involved.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that workers can challenge employers over unpaid wages. When employees believe their paychecks are wrong, they can file lawsuits under federal law. Settlement agreements allow workers to recover money without the cost and time of a full trial. This case reinforces that wage-theft claims are taken seriously by courts.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.