Hassan v. Classic Food Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement between plaintiff and defendant for $50,000, with plaintiff receiving $28,408.15 after attorney fees and costs. The case was dismissed with prejudice.
What This Ruling Means
Hassan v. Classic Food Inc. Settlement Summary
What Happened
Hassan filed a lawsuit against Classic Food Inc. in federal court in New York, claiming the company had stolen wages and wrongfully fired him from his job. These are serious employment violations that affect workers' paychecks and job security.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement where Classic Food Inc. agreed to pay $50,000 to resolve the dispute. After attorney fees and court costs were deducted, Hassan received $28,408.15. The case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers have legal options when employers fail to pay wages or fire them improperly. Although Hassan didn't receive the full settlement amount due to legal expenses, he still recovered compensation for the harm he suffered. The ruling demonstrates that courts take wage theft and wrongful termination seriously, and employers may face financial consequences for these violations. Workers facing similar situations should document evidence and consider consulting an attorney about their rights.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Hassan from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.