Skip to main content

Abraham v. Corizon Health Inc.

D. Or.December 5, 2019No. 3:16-cv-01877
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Ninth Circuit panel decision addressing ADA claims against Corizon Health Inc. regarding disability discrimination and reasonable accommodations in employment.

What This Ruling Means

**Abraham v. Corizon Health Inc. - Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved an employee named Abraham who sued Corizon Health Inc., claiming the company discriminated against them because of a disability. Abraham argued that Corizon failed to provide reasonable accommodations required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and treated them unfairly due to their disability. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mixed decision, meaning Abraham won on some claims but lost on others. The court found merit in some of the discrimination allegations but ruled against Abraham on other aspects of the case. No monetary damages were reported as part of this decision. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces that employers must take ADA requirements seriously. Companies cannot simply ignore requests for workplace accommodations from employees with disabilities. However, the mixed outcome also shows that disability discrimination cases can be complex, and workers need strong evidence to succeed on all claims. The case demonstrates that courts will carefully examine each aspect of a discrimination claim separately. Workers facing similar situations should document their accommodation requests and any adverse treatment they experience due to their disability.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.