Skip to main content

Board of Trustees of the Western States Office and Professional Employees Pension Fund v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 483

D. Or.December 11, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00156
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted the Fund's motion for summary judgment, affirming the arbitrator's award that pre-MPRA rehabilitation contribution rates adopted in collective bargaining agreements must be included in the withdrawal liability formula under ERISA, and vacating the contrary arbitrator award.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Case Summary: Pension Fund vs. Electrical Workers Union** **What Happened:** The Board of Trustees of the Western States Office and Professional Employees Pension Fund filed a lawsuit against the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 483 in 2020. The case involved a dispute over pension fund obligations under ERISA (the federal law that protects employee retirement plans). While the specific details of the disagreement aren't fully outlined in the available information, these types of cases typically involve disputes over contribution requirements, payment schedules, or compliance with pension fund rules. **What the Court Decided:** The court's final decision and outcome details are not provided in the available case information, so the specific ruling cannot be determined from this summary. **Why This Matters for Workers:** ERISA cases like this one are important for workers because they involve the protection of retirement benefits. When unions and pension fund trustees have disputes, it can potentially affect workers' future retirement security. ERISA exists specifically to ensure that employee pension plans are properly managed and funded. Even though this case's outcome isn't clear, such disputes highlight the ongoing legal framework that protects workers' pension rights and ensures employers and unions meet their retirement benefit obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.