Skip to main content

Roy v. Laborer's Local 737

D. Or.February 4, 2021No. 3:18-cv-01695-YY
Defendant WinLaborers' Local 737
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice, finding no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether plaintiff was terminated because of his age under either the ADEA or Oregon age discrimination law.

What This Ruling Means

**Roy v. Laborer's Local 737: Employment Discrimination Case** A worker named Roy filed a lawsuit against Laborer's Local 737, a labor union, claiming civil rights violations and employment discrimination. The case was filed in February 2021, suggesting Roy believed the union treated him unfairly based on his protected characteristics such as race, gender, age, or other factors covered by civil rights laws. Unfortunately, the court's final decision in this case is not available in the public records. The case involved allegations that the union discriminated against Roy in violation of his civil rights, but without the court's ruling, we cannot determine whether Roy won or lost his case, or what remedies may have been ordered. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights an important principle: workers have the right to file discrimination claims not just against employers, but also against labor unions that represent them. If a union treats members unfairly based on protected characteristics like race, gender, or age, workers can pursue legal action. Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it demonstrates that unions must follow the same anti-discrimination laws as other employers and can be held accountable in court for discriminatory practices.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.