BROWN v. KADENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Pennsylvania
- Circuit
- Third Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved a settlement of a collective FLSA action for wage and hour misclassification. The defendant agreed to pay $220,000 total, including $122,468 in back pay to 67 opt-in plaintiffs, a $2,500 service award to the lead plaintiff, $77,000 in attorneys' fees, and $17,500 in claims administrator costs.
What This Ruling Means
Brown v. Kadence International, Inc. - Case Summary
What Happened
Brown and 66 other workers filed a lawsuit against Kadence International, Inc., claiming the company misclassified them in ways that violated federal wage laws. The workers alleged they were not paid correctly for their work and were wrongfully terminated.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement requiring Kadence International to pay $220,000 total. This included $122,468 in back pay owed to the 67 workers involved, plus $2,500 to the lead plaintiff for leading the case, $77,000 in attorney fees, and $17,500 to cover administrative costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that companies can be held accountable for wage theft and misclassification. Workers who believe they've been underpaid or wrongfully fired may have legal options through collective lawsuits, which allow multiple employees to join together and share recovery. Even after settling, companies must compensate affected workers for wages they should have received.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.