O'Bryant v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Tennessee
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved a settlement agreement in an FLSA overtime collective action, awarding $1,400,576.40 to the settlement fund for opt-in plaintiffs, with average recovery of $126.15 per participant and approval of $442,250.00 in attorney's fees and costs.
What This Ruling Means
O'Bryant v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc.
What Happened
Employees at ABC Phones of North Carolina claimed the company failed to pay them overtime wages they had earned. Multiple workers joined together in a lawsuit, accusing their employer of wage theft—keeping money that should have gone to workers for extra hours worked.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement worth $1,400,576.40. This money will be distributed to workers who participated in the case, with each person receiving an average of $126.15. The court also approved $442,250 for the workers' lawyers to cover their legal costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that employees can successfully challenge employers over unpaid overtime. When workers band together in a group lawsuit, they gain stronger leverage to recover lost wages. Even though individual payments were modest, the total recovery demonstrates that companies can be held accountable for wage violations. Workers who believe they've been denied overtime pay have legal options to pursue compensation.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.