Contact Information
- Phone
- (312) 479-3014
- Website
- Visit Website
- Address
- 231 S LaSalle St Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60604, USA
Professional Details
- Listed Via
- Google Places office listing — View listing — as of Mar 2026
- Office Listing Rating
- 3.6/5 across 28 Google reviewsFirm or office listing data — not an individual attorney rating.
Recent federal employment cases
⚖ public court dockets- Employee v. Peoria Ear, Nose & Throat GroupDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2018published opinionCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. Board of Education of Peoria Public Schools District No. 150District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2026plaintiff counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. Greater Peoria Mass Transit DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025plaintiff counselFamily and Medical Leave Actpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. City of BloomingtonDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2024plaintiff counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. Clark Industrial Power LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2024defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. Clark Industrial Power, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2024defense counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. Bradley UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2024plaintiff counselCivil Rights: Employmentpublic docketreport case data
- Employee v. J.C. Dillon, Inc.
- Employee v. Canton Township, Fulton County, Illinois
- Employee v. Board of Education for Peoria District 150
- Employee v. City of Pekin
- Employee v. Board of Education for Peoria District 150
- Employee v. City of Pekin
- Employee v. Bradley University
- Employee v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
- Employee v. Village of Morton
- Employee v. Bradley University
- Employee v. Pekin Park District Board of Commissioners
- Employee v. Club Cabaret, Inc.
- Employee v. Bd. of Ed. for Peoria District 150District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2014plaintiff counselFamily and Medical Leave Actpublic docketreport case data
Source: U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/RECAP via CourtListener). One case is one normalized court+docket number. Attorney-to-docket links are algorithmically matched; ambiguous and lower-confidence identities are excluded.
A case on file means this attorney appeared in a federal employment lawsuit — most of these settled or closed without a judge writing a decision, which is normal. Rows marked “published opinion” open a written decision that passes the same public trust checks used elsewhere on this site. Each row also links to its source docket on CourtListener.
This list covers only publicly matched federal cases — it is an undercount, not a career total, and it says nothing about cases in state court, arbitration, or settled before filing.
Employee names are withheld by this site; full captions are available on the public docket.
Useful for evaluating public litigation experience. Court dockets do not reliably measure negotiation or settlement skill; confirm those services with the attorney or firm.
Other Employment Attorneys in Chicago
Browse other attorney listings in this area.
Facing a workplace issue?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Check My RightsAttorney listings are aggregated from public legal directories (including NELA, Avvo, and Google Places). Ratings, review counts, and membership badges are reported by those third-party sources — they are not a verification, endorsement, or recommendation by Workers’ Rights. Inclusion here does not mean the attorney is affiliated with, sponsors, or has any relationship with this site, and no attorney-client relationship is created. Always verify credentials, disciplinary history, and bar standing before retaining an attorney.