Acts Retirement-Life Communities, Inc.
11 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2016–2026)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 5 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Acts Retirement-Life Communities, Inc. as an employer in 11 distinct federal employment cases between 2016 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in AL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Acts Retirement-Life Communities, Inc. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Hamil v. Acts Westminster (2025) — Defendant Win. A worker filed a lawsuit against Acts Retirement-Life Communities, Inc., claiming the employer discriminated against them based on their religion and failed to provide reasonable accommodations for their needs. Read the ruling.
Kelly v. ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc. (2023) — Mixed Result. Kelly filed a lawsuit against ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, claiming she faced discrimination based on a disability, wasn't given proper accommodations for her condition, and was wrongfully fired because of her disability status. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate, Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span Alabama (1), Maryland (1). Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Alabama rulings and Maryland rulings.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.