ADT LLC
43 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2025)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases · 7 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list ADT LLC as an employer in 43 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2025.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 5 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Retaliation, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 5 states, most often in NC.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
ADT LLC appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Aziz v. ADT LLC (2025) — Defendant Win. Aziz filed a lawsuit against ADT LLC claiming the company discriminated against him because of a disability. The worker alleged that his employer treated him unfairly or took negative job actions due to his disability status, violating laws that protect workers from this type of discrimination. Read the ruling.
Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local Union 43 v. NLRB (2021) — Remanded. ADT LLC, a security company, changed its employees' work schedules to require a mandatory six-day workweek. The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union challenged this decision, arguing that ADT should have negotiated the change with the union before implementing it, as required by their contract. Read the ruling.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL-CIO, Local Union 369 v. ADT, LLC (2020) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a dispute between the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 369 and ADT, LLC over whether the company had valid reasons to fire an employee. The union challenged the termination, arguing that ADT did not have "just cause" to dismiss the worker. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination (3 of 8), Retaliation (2 of 8), Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Retaliation and Breach of Contract.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span North Carolina (2), New York (1), Maryland (1), Texas (1). Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. North Carolina rulings, New York rulings, Maryland rulings and Texas rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in ADT LLC’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.