Albertson's, Inc.
19 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1993–2024)
10 trusted published court opinions across 10 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Albertson's, Inc. as an employer in 19 distinct federal employment cases between 1993 and 2024.
Of the 10 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 5 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 had a mixed result, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Hostile Work Environment, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in CO.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 10 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Albertson's, Inc. appears in 10 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Albertson's LLC (2008) — Mixed Result. This case involved employment discrimination claims against Albertson's, a major grocery store chain. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces federal anti-discrimination laws, filed a lawsuit alleging that Albertson's engaged in discriminatory practices against employees or job applicants. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Albertson's LLC (2007) — Mixed Result. This case involved allegations of racial and ethnic harassment at an Albertson's distribution center. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued the company on behalf of workers who claimed they faced discrimination, harassment, and a hostile work environment. Read the ruling.
General Warehousemen & Helpers Union Local 767 v. Albertson's Distribution, Inc. (2003) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a dispute between a warehouse workers' union and Albertson's Distribution over whether the company properly fired an employee. The union wanted to challenge the termination through arbitration (a process where a neutral third party resolves disputes instead of going to court), but Albertson's argued… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (6 of 10), Hostile Work Environment (4 of 10), Wrongful Termination (2 of 10). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Hostile Work Environment and Wrongful Termination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span Colorado (2), California (1). Colorado is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Colorado rulings and California rulings.
These published opinions sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
10 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Retail employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.