AutoZone, Inc.
118 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2010–2026)
14 trusted published court opinions across 14 distinct cases · 6 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, AutoZone, Inc. is named as a party in 118 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2010 and 2026.
Of the 12 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 6 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 settled.
2 further opinions are listed below but left out of these outcome figures, because the employer brought the case or was not a party to it.
The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate, Discrimination, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 6 states, most often in MO.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 14 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
AutoZone, Inc. appears in 14 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Felton v. Autozone, Inc. (2025) — Defendant Win. Felton worked at AutoZone and was fired after refusing to take a mandatory drug test following a workplace injury. He sued the company, claiming he was discriminated against based on his gender, retaliated against for some protected action, and wrongfully terminated. Read the ruling.
Jesse Alvarez v. AutoZone, Inc. (2022) — Remanded. Jesse Alvarez filed a wage theft case against AutoZone, Inc., claiming the company violated California labor laws. Alvarez brought the case under PAGA, a California law that allows workers to sue on behalf of other employees affected by wage violations. AutoZone tried to move the case to federal court. Read the ruling.
Carr v. Autozoners LLC (2021) — Defendant Win. Employees at AutoZone stores filed a lawsuit claiming the company improperly classified certain workers as managers, which meant they didn't receive overtime pay they were legally owed. The workers wanted to combine their cases into one group lawsuit so they could pursue their wage theft claims together. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Failure to Accommodate (6 of 14), Discrimination (5 of 14), Retaliation (4 of 14). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate, Discrimination and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Missouri (2), California (1), Alabama (1), Illinois (1). Missouri is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Missouri rulings, California rulings, Alabama rulings and Illinois rulings.
These published opinions sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories.
Opinion Outcomes
2 listed opinions are not counted here: the employer brought the case, or was not a party to an appeal against an agency, so the recorded outcome is not a result for or against a worker.
Opinion Stages
12 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in AutoZone, Inc.’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
1 published opinion names this party but is not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.