Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC
9 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2025)
4 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC as an employer in 9 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2025.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Discrimination, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 1 state (ID).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Gonzales v. Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (2025) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved an employee named Gonzales who sued Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC, claiming the company discriminated against them because of a disability and failed to provide reasonable accommodations at work. Read the ruling.
Gonzales v. Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (2025) — Plaintiff Win. Roman Gonzales worked for Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC. The company fired him based on his disability, according to court findings. Gonzales sued, claiming the employer violated employment laws protecting workers with disabilities. Read the ruling.
Steingruber v. Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (2023) — Mixed Result. Steinbruber worked for Battelle Energy Alliance and claimed the company discriminated against her, harassed her, retaliated against her for speaking up, failed to make reasonable work adjustments, and created a hostile work environment. She also alleged she was wrongfully fired. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Discrimination, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Discrimination and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Idaho. Idaho is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Idaho rulings.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.