Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
63 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2010–2026)
1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case · 12 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia is named as a defendant in 63 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2010 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 1 state (GA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion:
ZHANG v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA (2024) — Defendant Win. Zhang filed a lawsuit against the University System of Georgia, claiming he faced discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment because of his disability. He also argued the university failed to provide reasonable accommodations for his condition. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Retaliation, Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Failure to Accommodate.
The published opinion came from Georgia. Georgia rulings.
This published opinion sits within the education sector, where Title IX intersects with Title VII and tenure-revocation cases raise heightened procedural protections.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.