Catastrophe Management Solutions
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2017)
5 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Catastrophe Management Solutions as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2017.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 5 ended in a ruling for the employer.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in AL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Catastrophe Management Solutions appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Catastrophe Management Solutions (2017) — Defendant Win. Chastity Jones, a Black woman, was offered a job at Catastrophe Management Solutions but the company rescinded the offer after she refused to remove her dreadlocks. The company had a grooming policy that prohibited dreadlocks. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Catastrophe Management Solutions (2017) — Defendant Win. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (a federal agency that protects workers) sued Catastrophe Management Solutions on behalf of employees. The EEOC claimed the company discriminated based on race by prohibiting workers from wearing dreadlocks. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Catastrophe Management Solutions (2016) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute over whether employers can ban dreadlocks in their workplace grooming policies. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Catastrophe Management Solutions, arguing that prohibiting dreadlocks constituted racial discrimination under federal law. Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a discrimination claim. Browse other discrimination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Discrimination.
Published opinions span Alabama (3), Florida (1). Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Alabama rulings and Florida rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.