C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
13 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2007–2024)
3 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is named as a defendant in 13 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2007 and 2024.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Constructive Discharge, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in IL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Dietrich v. C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (2020) — Mixed Result. An employee named Dietrich sued C.H. Robinson Worldwide, claiming the company failed to pay minimum wage and forced him to resign through poor working conditions (a practice called constructive discharge). Read the ruling.
Dietrich v. C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (2019) — Plaintiff Win. An employee named Dietrich sued C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., claiming the company misclassified workers and failed to pay overtime wages they were legally owed. Dietrich also claimed he was wrongfully terminated after raising these wage concerns. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft, Constructive Discharge, Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Constructive Discharge and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span Illinois (2), Minnesota (1). Illinois is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Illinois rulings and Minnesota rulings.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.