Clark Construction Group, LLC
10 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2004–2020)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Clark Construction Group, LLC as an employer in 10 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2020.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 had a mixed result, and 2 ended in a ruling for the worker.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Workers Compensation, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in DC.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Clark Construction Group, LLC appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Haley v. Clark Construction Group-California, Inc. (2020) — Defendant Win. This case involved a worker named Haley who sued Clark Construction Group-California, claiming the company discriminated against them. Haley filed the lawsuit in federal court in January 2020, alleging that the construction company treated them unfairly based on protected characteristics covered by employment discrimin… Read the ruling.
Clark Construction Group, LLC v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (2017) — Plaintiff Win. Mr. Banks, an employee of Clark Construction Group, suffered neck and lower back injuries in a work accident. The company disputed whether his injuries were truly connected to the job, which affected his eligibility for workers' compensation benefits. Read the ruling.
JEFFREY BOWSER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, and CLARK CONSTRUCTION, LLC, INTERVENORS. (2016) — Mixed Result. Jeffrey Bowser, who worked for Clark Construction, LLC, filed a workers' compensation claim with the D.C. Department of Employment Services. The dispute centered on whether Bowser should continue receiving temporary disability payments and medical benefits for carpal tunnel syndrome and psychological treatment related… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (2 of 8), Workers’ Compensation (2 of 8), Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Workers’ Compensation and Breach of Contract.
Published opinions span District of Columbia (2), Maryland (2), California (1). District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings, Maryland rulings and California rulings.
These published opinions sit within the construction sector, where OSHA retaliation, prevailing-wage disputes, and joint-employer issues are common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in Clark Construction Group, LLC’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Construction employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.