Consol Energy, Inc.
19 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2024)
10 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Consol Energy, Inc. as an employer in 19 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2024.
Of the 10 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the worker, 4 had a mixed result, and 2 ended in a ruling for the employer.
Plaintiffs won 4 of 10 adjudicated opinions (40%).
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Discrimination, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in WV.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
4 of 10 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Consol Energy, Inc. appears in 10 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
MOORE v. CONSOL ENERGY INC. (2024) — Mixed Result. Coal miners at CONSOL Pennsylvania Coal Company LLC sued their employer, claiming they weren't paid for time spent putting on and taking off safety equipment and gathering tools before and after their shifts. The miners argued this unpaid work should have been compensated under federal wage laws. Read the ruling.
ROBINSON v. CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL COMPANY, LLC (2019) — Mixed Result. This case involved a workplace discrimination claim by an employee named Robinson against CONSOL Pennsylvania Coal Company, a mining company. Robinson filed a lawsuit alleging that the company discriminated against him, though the specific details of the discrimination are not provided in the available information. Read the ruling.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Consol Energy, Inc. (2017) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) suing Consol Energy, Inc. for workplace discrimination and retaliation against employees. The EEOC claimed the company violated federal laws that protect workers from unfair treatment based on protected characteristics and from punishment for reporti… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (4 of 10), Discrimination (3 of 10), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 10). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Discrimination and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span West Virginia (4), District of Columbia (2), Pennsylvania (2). West Virginia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. West Virginia rulings, District of Columbia rulings and Pennsylvania rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
10 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 0 ended the case in Consol Energy, Inc.’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.