DaimlerChrysler Corporation
3 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2002–2007)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is named as a defendant in 3 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2002 and 2007.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Whistleblower, and Hostile Work Environment.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in OH.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
DaimlerChrysler Corporation appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adams v. Daimlerchrysler Services NA (2007) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employee named Adams who sued DaimlerChrysler Services after being terminated. Adams claimed the company discriminated against him, retaliated against him for complaining about workplace issues, failed to accommodate his needs under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and wrongfully fired him… Read the ruling.
Herrington v. DAIMLERCHTYSLER CORP. (2003) — Defendant Win. Michael Herrington, a DaimlerChrysler employee, filed a whistleblower lawsuit claiming the company retaliated against him for reporting workplace safety violations to federal regulators. Read the ruling.
Wright v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2002) — Defendant Win. This case involved a worker who sued DaimlerChrysler for sexual harassment, retaliation, creating a hostile work environment, and wage theft. The employee filed the lawsuit after experiencing workplace problems at the company. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Whistleblower, Hostile Work Environment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Whistleblower and Hostile Work Environment.
Published opinions span Ohio (1), Michigan (1). Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Ohio rulings and Michigan rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
2 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.