Dana Corporation
13 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2010–2024)
3 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Dana Corporation is named as a defendant in 13 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2010 and 2024.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Harassment, and Hostile Work Environment.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in MI.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Dana Corporation appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Lee v. Dana Incorporated (2024) — Defendant Win. Lee filed a lawsuit against Dana Incorporated claiming the company failed to pay workers properly for time spent putting on safety equipment and walking to work sites. Lee argued these activities should count as paid work time under federal wage laws. Read the ruling.
McDaniel v. Dana Corporation (2020) — Dismissed. McDaniel filed a lawsuit against Dana Corporation claiming discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and a hostile work environment. These are serious allegations about unfair treatment based on protected characteristics or negative actions taken against an employee for complaining about workplace problems. Read the ruling.
McDaniel v. Dana Corporation (2020) — Dismissed. This case involved a civil rights dispute between an employee named McDaniel and Dana Corporation, a manufacturing company. The case was filed in 2020 and handled by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers several Midwest states including Ohio, Michigan, and Tennessee. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Harassment, Hostile Work Environment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Harassment and Hostile Work Environment.
Published opinions span Michigan (2), Ohio (1). Michigan is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Michigan rulings and Ohio rulings.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
2 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.