DCP Midstream, L.P.
6 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2009–2022)
6 trusted published court opinions across 1 distinct case
What public court records show
In public federal court records, DCP Midstream, L.P. is named as a defendant in 6 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2009 and 2022.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 6 ended in a ruling for the worker.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Hostile Work Environment.
Cases were filed across 1 state (ME).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
Positive amounts in plaintiff-win, mixed-outcome, or settlement opinions only. AI-extracted; amounts may not equal money paid.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
DCP Midstream, L.P. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Eeoc v. Dcp Midstream, Lp (2009) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved Daniel Mayo, who worked for DCP Midstream, LP, an energy company. Mayo complained about racial discrimination he witnessed or experienced at work. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. DCP Midstream, L.P. (2009) — Plaintiff Win. Daniel Mayo worked for DCP Midstream, LP and reported that he was being treated unfairly because of his race. After making this complaint, the company retaliated against him—meaning they punished him for speaking up about the discrimination. Read the ruling.
Eeoc v. Dcp Medstream, Lp (2009) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved Daniel Mayo, an employee at DCP Midstream, L.P., who complained about racially offensive behavior in his workplace. After Mayo spoke up about the racial harassment he witnessed or experienced, his employer took negative actions against him in response to his complaint. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (6 of 6), Discrimination (4 of 6), Hostile Work Environment (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment.
Published opinions span Maine. Maine is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Maine rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.