East Penn Manufacturing Company, Inc.
8 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2024)
10 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list East Penn Manufacturing Company, Inc. as an employer in 8 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2024.
Of the 10 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the worker, 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, and 2 had a mixed result.
Plaintiffs won 4 of 10 adjudicated opinions (40%).
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 1 state (PA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
4 of 10 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
East Penn Manufacturing Company, Inc. appears in 10 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Secretary United States Department of Labor v. East Penn Manufacturing Inc (2024) — Plaintiff Win. The U.S. Department of Labor filed an enforcement action against East Penn Manufacturing Inc., a company that appears to have violated federal employment laws. While the specific details of what the company allegedly did wrong aren't provided in the available information, the case made its way to the Third Circuit Cour… Read the ruling.
Secretary United States Department of Labor v. East Penn Manufacturing Inc (2024) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved East Penn Manufacturing, a company that required hourly workers to change into work clothes and shower at the workplace. The U.S. Department of Labor sued the company, claiming it failed to pay workers for the time they spent changing and showering, which violated federal wage laws. Read the ruling.
SCALIA v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. (2023) — Plaintiff Win. Employees at East Penn Manufacturing Company sued their employer, claiming the company failed to pay them for time spent putting on and taking off work gear, as well as showering during work hours. These activities are necessary parts of the job but the company wasn't compensating workers for them. Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a wage theft claim. Browse other wage theft rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wage Theft.
Published opinions span Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Pennsylvania rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
10 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.