Skip to main content
Manufacturing

EBSCO Industries Inc

10 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20132021)

1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case

What public court records show

Public federal court records list EBSCO Industries Inc as an employer in 10 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2021.

The most common claims on record were Wage Theft.

Cases were filed across 1 state (AR).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

1
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 1 distinct case.

1
States

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

EBSCO Industries Inc appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion:

Fingerhut v. EBSCO Industries, Inc. (2021) — Settlement. An employee named Fingerhut worked for EBSCO Industries and claimed the company wrongly classified him as an "exempt" employee. This classification meant he wasn't entitled to overtime pay. Fingerhut believed he should have been paid as a regular employee and was owed unpaid wages for the hours he worked. Read the ruling.

The published opinion involves a wage theft claim. Browse other wage theft rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wage Theft.

The published opinion came from Arkansas. Arkansas rulings.

This published opinion sits within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.

Claim Types

Wage Theft
1 (100%)

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. EBSCO Industries, Inc.
W.D. Ark. · Feb 2021 · Arkansas · Wage Theft
Settlement
Employee v. EBSCO Industries Inc
N.D. Ala. · Sep 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · Feb 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries Inc
N.D. Ala. · Jan 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries
N.D. Ala. · Nov 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries Inc
N.D. Ala. · May 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries Inc
N.D. Ala. · Jul 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries, Inc.
N.D. Ala. · Jan 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries Inc
N.D. Ala. · Nov 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. EBSCO Industries Inc
N.D. Ala. · Mar 2013
Docket closed
Showing 10 of 10

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.