Equinox Holdings, Inc.
35 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2010–2025)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 3 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Equinox Holdings, Inc. is named as a defendant in 35 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2010 and 2025.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 had a mixed result and 2 ended in a ruling for the employer.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Retaliation, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in NY.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Equinox Holdings, Inc. appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adams v. Equinox Holdings, Inc. (2024) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.
Katz v. Equinox Holdings, Inc. (2022) — Mixed Result. Workers at Equinox, the upscale fitness chain, filed a lawsuit claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The employees alleged that Equinox failed to pay them properly under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace pay requirements. Read the ruling.
Adams v. Equinox Holdings, Inc. (2020) — Mixed Result. This case involved a worker who sued Equinox Holdings, the luxury gym chain, claiming the company discriminated against them based on a disability. The employee filed their lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which protects workers from discrimination due to their disabilities and requires employer… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (4 of 5), Retaliation (3 of 5), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 5). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Retaliation and Failure to Accommodate.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.
Published opinions span New York (2), California (2). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings and California rulings.
These published opinions sit within the hospitality sector, where wage theft, tip-pooling violations, and sexual-harassment claims are common.
Opinion Outcomes
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
1 published opinion names this party but is not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.