Federal Reserve Bank of New York
38 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1979–2025)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases · 3 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Federal Reserve Bank of New York is named as a defendant in 38 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1979 and 2025.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in MO.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Federal Reserve Bank of New York appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Poorfakhraei v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2022) — Dismissed. An employee at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis filed a lawsuit claiming they were wrongfully fired and treated unfairly because of discrimination. The employee also said the bank failed to make necessary accommodations for a medical condition, violating federal laws that protect workers with disabilities and thos… Read the ruling.
BERINI v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2006) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employee named Berini who worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and claimed she faced age discrimination under federal law. She argued that her employer treated her unfairly because of her age, which would violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Reserve Bank (1979) — Mixed Result. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency protecting workers' rights, filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of multiple employees at the Federal Reserve Bank. The employees claimed they faced discrimination, wrongful termination, and a hostile work environment. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wrongful Termination and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span Missouri (2), Tennessee (1). Missouri is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Missouri rulings and Tennessee rulings.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
2 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.