Forest River, Inc.
18 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2025)
6 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Forest River, Inc. as an employer in 18 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2025.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 settled, 1 were dismissed, and 1 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Hostile Work Environment.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in IN.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Forest River, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Wininger v. Forest River Manufacturing, LLC (2024) — Defendant Win. An employee named Wininger filed a lawsuit against Forest River Manufacturing after reporting that a coworker had sexually assaulted her. She claimed the company created a hostile work environment, retaliated against her for reporting the assault, and effectively forced her to quit (known as constructive discharge). Read the ruling.
Owens v. Forest River Manufacturing, LLC (2022) — Defendant Win. Owens filed a lawsuit against Forest River Manufacturing, claiming she experienced sexual harassment and a hostile work environment. She also alleged the company fired her in retaliation for reporting the harassment. Read the ruling.
Imbro v. Forest River Inc (2022) — Mixed Result. An employee named Imbro filed a lawsuit against Forest River Inc., claiming the company discriminated against them based on sex and age, wrongfully forced them to quit (constructive discharge), and failed to pay wages owed. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 6), Retaliation (3 of 6), Hostile Work Environment (3 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Hostile Work Environment.
Published opinions span Indiana (4), Massachusetts (1). Indiana is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Indiana rulings and Massachusetts rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 3 summary-judgment opinions, 3 ended the case in Forest River, Inc.’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.