Gate Gourmet, Inc.
21 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2005–2025)
6 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Gate Gourmet, Inc. as an employer in 21 distinct federal employment cases between 2005 and 2025.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 were dismissed, 1 had a mixed result, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Wage Theft, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Gate Gourmet, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Solis v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. (2024) — Dismissed. An employee named Solis sued Gate Gourmet, Inc., claiming the company owed them money. The allegations included not returning deposits with interest, failing to pay out earned vacation time, and engaging in unfair business practices. Read the ruling.
Solis v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. (2024) — Mixed Result. An employee named Solis sued Gate Gourmet, Inc., claiming the company failed to pay wages properly and wrongfully terminated them. The case involved allegations of wage theft and other payment violations. Read the ruling.
Charles Scott v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. (2021) — Defendant Win. Charles Scott sued Gate Gourmet, Inc., claiming he was wrongfully fired. Scott argued that the company violated federal CARES Act conditions (relief funds given during the pandemic) and California consumer protection laws when it terminated him. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination (2 of 6), Wage Theft (2 of 6), Breach of Contract (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Wage Theft and Breach of Contract.
Published opinions span California (3), District of Columbia (2), Florida (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, District of Columbia rulings and Florida rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.