GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
14 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2003–2025)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY as an employer in 14 distinct federal employment cases between 2003 and 2025.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 were sent back to a lower court and 1 ended in a ruling for the employer.
The most common claims on record were Workers Compensation.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
About this employer
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Honemond v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Georgetown University (2023) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between an employee named Honemond and two employers: the D.C. Department of Employment Services and Georgetown University. The specific details of what triggered the legal conflict are not available from the court records provided. Read the ruling.
Georgetown University v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (2009) — Remanded. An injured worker at Georgetown University filed a workers' compensation claim seeking temporary total disability benefits. The case centered on which doctor's medical opinion should carry the most weight in determining the worker's condition and ability to work. Read the ruling.
Georgetown University v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (2009) — Remanded. This case involved a dispute between Georgetown University and a worker who was seeking workers' compensation benefits for temporary total disability. The worker had filed a claim for benefits, meaning they were unable to work due to a workplace injury and needed financial support during their recovery period. Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a workers’ compensation claim. Browse other workers’ compensation rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Workers’ Compensation.
These published opinions sit within the education sector, where Title IX intersects with Title VII and tenure-revocation cases raise heightened procedural protections.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Education employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.